Tuber (Tubular belay device): Difference between revisions
m →Security concerns: - link trimming |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| cons = Does not provide assisted braking function, it blocks only if dead rope is in the opposite direction to the live rope, can bite into skin of the brake hand index finger if used inappropriately, in majority of the devices the setup for lowering of a second climber is cumbersome | | cons = Does not provide assisted braking function, it blocks only if dead rope is in the opposite direction to the live rope, can bite into skin of the brake hand index finger if used inappropriately, in majority of the devices the setup for lowering of a second climber is cumbersome | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{messagebox_checkstate}} | |||
'''Tubular belay devices''' are the most commonly used belay devices for training of advanced climbing and rescue techniques, multipitching, and management of twin/double ropes. In some countries/clubs, they have been replaced by assisted tubular belay devices in single-pitch trainings. They are prohibited in some gyms due to the alleged security concerns (for details, see the [[#security concerns|security concerns section]]). | '''Tubular belay devices''' are the most commonly used belay devices for training of advanced climbing and rescue techniques, multipitching, and management of twin/double ropes. In some countries/clubs, they have been replaced by assisted tubular belay devices in single-pitch trainings. They are prohibited in some gyms due to the alleged security concerns (for details, see the [[#security concerns|security concerns section]]). | ||
| Line 129: | Line 131: | ||
== Security concerns == | == Security concerns == | ||
{{Disclaimer|This section reflects both subjective opinions and the positions of various alpine clubs. Qualified readers are encouraged to form their own judgment, or to follow the recommendations of recognized organizations. Unqualified readers are pointed to their club rules/recommendations. The aim here is not to prescribe one device over another, but to present different perspectives, so that climbers can make their own informed and responsible decisions. Neither [[User:Karl|Karl]], nor any other contributor to this article promotes or discourages the use of specific devices; the responsibility lies fully with the climber and belayer.}} | |||
With non-assisted belay devices, the brake hand is the single point of failure. If the rope is released, a fall will not be slowed-down. While this carries inherent risk (if you let go, you let go), many climbers value these devices because they provide clear, immediate feedback on correct technique which helps to reinforce good habits. Also feeding the slack is except of a few cases smoother than with assisted-breaking devices. | With non-assisted belay devices, the brake hand is the single point of failure. If the rope is released, a fall will not be slowed-down. While this carries inherent risk (if you let go, you let go), many climbers value these devices because they provide clear, immediate feedback on correct technique which helps to reinforce good habits. Also feeding the slack is except of a few cases smoother than with assisted-breaking devices. | ||